Attention:
Due
to a possibly censorship can this post be retrieved via the
following links:
|
|||||
|
http://perceptionofresponsibility.blogspot.de/2016/01/ensainmailarchive.html
(searching for date 10.04.2016)
Unfortunately,
the German judicial system requires such precautions!
|
|||||
@Google
@GermanJudiciary @FlorianHensel @World
#Censorship
#OpinionSuppression #ResponsibilityPerceiving
#EthicalValues #GoogleCensorship
#MoralPrinciples
|
|||||
|
Florian
Hensel
Attorney 
Florian
Hensel |
||||
|
Marcus
Krol |
Kai
Schmidt |
Andrea
Prinz |
Wolfram
Schorr |
||
Dear
readers,
Unfortunately
the disregard of fundamental rights referring the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR)
as well as the
European Convention of the Human Rights
(ECtHR)
within Germany requires an addressing of underlying occurrences to
the world public opinion.
Referring
to
Article
19
of
the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights
has
everyone the
right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes
freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive
and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers.
Referring
to Article
10
of
the European
Convention on Human Rights
has
everyone the
right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom
to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas
without interference by public authority and regardless of
frontiers.
Those
articles stating without doubts that documentations about
occurrences which abuses ethical and moral values cannot be
prevented by governments or judicial authorities. Otherwise we
would facing to constellations where it would be impossible to
prevent an attempt of a re-establishment of an injustice system. I
don't believe, that evildoers such as the below historical
examples could have been persuaded by good talking to waiver their
bad intentions. This is confirmed also by the scientific
historical research and caused therefore the proclamation of
several fundamental law collections such as the UDHR and
ECtHR where the right to freedom of opinion and expression
was declared to protect the mankind from such sinister
developments as happened in the 20th century.
|
|||||
Contrary to
the above described scientific findings and contrary to the
understanding of the rest of democratic-oriented countries within
the world acting the German
|
|||||
judicial
system as though this context would be absolutely irrelevant
and favors instead the rights of personality. It cannot be denied
that this would cause an inevitable repetition of our sinister
history since it would enable to hide the true intention of
potentially evildoers. So, we must assume that the acting from
German judicial authorities is simple a so-called reason in order
to disregard effectively fundamental rights through simulating the
semblance of the rule of law. Considering our history it can not
be hidden that the German judicial system has a certain practice
of the deception of the world public opinion. Even
if we projecting this treatment from German judicial authorities
to the period before the proclamation of the fundamental laws,
then we would notice undoubtedly that this acting is contrary to
the intention from those originators who participated
in the formulation of the UDHR,
ECtHR
as well as the German Basic Law.
In this case we would recognize that German judicial authorities
would favor the personal right of evildoers
such as Adolf Hitler against the right
of free opinion and expression from the members of the White Rose
resistant group. No one will probably deny that this was never the
intention from the participants of the formulation of the UDHR,
ECtHR
and the German Basic Law.
Therefor we have to consider, that this reversal of the intention
might either relate to an issue of unreflected or target-oriented
acting. I don't want further comment the second issue since it
could be a matter of punishment in the seemingly constitutional
country Germany.
|
|||||
The
country of veiled censorship
and pretended justice |
It
is astonishing that Germany pretends it respects the fundamental
rights of freedom of opinion and expression, but supporting behind
their hand
|
||||
censorship
of online
documentations about abuses and
expecting nevertheless that it should be perceived as a country
following
the rule
of law. No
other country of the democratically oriented international
community supports censorship in
the same way
as
Germany. So,
we should be aware that Germany hereby
embarks on same level as countries such as China, North-Korea or
Saudi Arabia which are known traditionally for opinion
suppression.
It
has to be considered that the following web sides of the
documentation about abuses will be blocked. Even
this gives an impression, mediated by German judicial authorities,
that misuses is not a matter of a personal perception but is an
exclusive definition subject
from German judicial authorities. Nevertheless
that these authorities had failed already within history 3 times
to cover its purpose.
We
have to remember that personalities were considered as offenders
at that time who are standing today as those who resisted the
expectation of the majority and didn't just accept abuses. So,
the obviously expectation of judicial authorities that individuals
should simple let it happen, thwarted our duty of perceiving the
responsibility considering our history.
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
The attorney
of the wrongdoer's requested at Google to block this websites as
they would allegedly violating copyrights. It is unquestionable
that this a deliberate lie from the attorney which seems to follow
an intention to create accomplished facts. Every historian would
classify such kind of behavior as mechanisms from organizations
such as SS, GESTAPO or STASI. This indicates
without any doubts that the attorney Mr Florian Hensel has nothing
learned from our history. The scientific historical research
describes exactly that such kind of unreflected behavior must be
identified as root cause of our disastrous history. The author
provides below alternate paths to the above URLs, for the case
that the websites has been blocked again, so that readers should
be able to identify the brazen lie of Mr Florian Hensel.
|
|||||
Without
a workaround the retrieving of the above documentation pages shows
the
error page referenced
below.
From
my point of view is it not acceptable that the fundamental right
of
|
Why
supports Google
censorship like China, North-Korea or Saudi Arabia |
||||
freedom
of opinion and expression will be undermined by this way from
German judicial authorities as well as from Google. This indicates
a perspective about fundamental rights from
involved institutions and companies which fills me with horror
considering analogous occurrences within the 20th century. Further
more, the attorney of the opposing party requested from Google a
blocking of my documentation with the false accusations that it
would violate copyrights. This is unquestionably a lie which
obviously follows the intention of creating accomplished facts by
driving the counterpart to suicide.
|
|||||
This
gives an analogous impression to our historical injustice system
mediated by German judicial authorities as we should be aware,
that it might be much better for our health to
|
|||||
renounce
on fundamental rights of the freedom of opinion and expression. It
even mediates an impression as represents the German judicial
authorities a conception where the right of freedom of opinion and
expression is only legalized to organizations such as press media
which not silently can be forced on the renunciation of those
fundamental rights. From
individuals they seems to expect, that they should renounce on
fundamental rights otherwise they would risk to be driven into a
financial disaster through years of processes or finally to
suicide due to the unbearable pressure caused by activities from
judicial authorities. Until
today the German judicial authorities have not internalized the
essential difference between an injustice system and a system
following the rule of law. A system which follows the rule of law
leaves individuals unmolested as long as they have done nothing
wrong. In contrast an injustice system causes pressure against
individuals in order to make them tractable. How should we
evaluate a procedure which are flooding individuals by interim
disposal who simply follows the fundamental human right of the
freedom of expression.
|
|||||
Opinion suppression and Censorship can't be justified under any circumstances |
|||||
It
seems that this country has nothing learned from our burdened
history, where the worst mankind disaster have been mainly caused
by unreflected
behavior from companies and judicial authorities. Such kind of
behavior can only be interpreted as goal-oriented endeavor with
the intention to disable systematically the fundamental laws. Even
this country and especially the judicial authorities of this
country ignores constantly, that within three injustice system its
predecessor institutions have failed to cover the role of its
determination. Exactly because of this reason the fundamental laws
has been proclaimed to ensure the prevention of a reincarnation of
an ominous development.
|
|||||
In underlying
cases was promised to the author that his employment will be
transferred from a temporary to a permanent contract after a half
year. This promise was never withdrawn but not implemented and the
author thereby compelled to afford immense unpaid overtime. The
overuse went so far that the author had to survive two emergency
calls, where one of them caused a sustained permanent damage. This
has been identified
by contemporary witness, descendants of contemporary witness and
consulted historians
as similar
occurrences from detailed description from concentration camps
where victims have been compelled to forced labor and their
ultimate destruction was been planned from beginning by fraudulent
and wrong promises. Because
of the obligation of the
perception
of responsibility against our burdened history we are obligated
never again accepting such kind of behavior.
It should
be noticed that the author was asked by colleagues constantly on
weekly basis, why the promises of the company of transferring his
employment to a permanent contract has still not been
accomplished, contrary of the promises and although the author
showed the most committed performance within the whole company.
The author himself addressed the same question even constantly on
weekly basis to the project management, who kindly excused the
delay and consoled him with a imminent implementation. It
must be assumed that the duress and deception was based on the
intention to cause an unpaid fulfillment of the author's
performance.
|
|||||
Further
should be noticed, that the author has compensated an 8 members
expert team of an
external subcontractor which otherwise would have caused costs for
the company which had to be extrapolated with
|
The
country with traditional complicity between companies and
regulatory institutions and judicial authorities
|
||||
factor
100 of the salary of the author. So
it is without any doubts that the intention of the company was to
take advantage without appropriate payment of the author in a
similar manner as it has been described by eyewitness accounts
from forced labor within the German system of injustice. I am sure
that nobody would accept such behavior, where less payed temporary
workers should have to handle the damage elimination (i.e. after
an accident within of a nuclear power station) which normally
requires a specialized, highly payed expert team. The
intention of saving costs by such kind of behavior is without
doubts an hided applied slavery employment which trusts on
complicity and the
mechanisms
of looking
away from regulatory and judicial authorities.
Also on this
topic the traditional complicity of German regulatory institutions
and judicial authorities cannot be hidden. We have to remember
that forced labor within the injustice system was over decades
hidden within German politics, companies and judicial authorities.
Seemingly,
in this country one assumes that it would be enough to set-up a
foundation after decades of the human rights violation and after
a majority of the victims are deceased in
order to compensate the victims out of the petty cash.
Because
of the background of underlying occurrences, the author will not
renounce on his
right
respectively his duty to publish the underlying occurrences even
if it should requires an ultimate acceptance of a predetermined
destiny similar to the
following
heroes,
who have
nevertheless
stood
up for their convictions with courage.
It
is without any questions that bloggers in today's world fulfill
the role of the traditional press media in the past, especially as
the controlling function of press media will not seldom ignored by
German journalists. So,
the acting of the German judicial authorities violates not only
the fundamental right of freedom of opinion and expression, it is
also an attack on the freedom of press media which shows a
disturbed relationship toward a liberal democratic system.
|
|||||
Readers
should notice that the author of the documentation was been
exposed by reprisals from involved attorneys and judicial
authorities which caused once in our history that people haven't
seen any other ways than emigrating or choosing suicide to escape
the unbearable pressures from judicial authorities. Even intended
attorneys and judicial authorities repeated to bring the author to
a closed psychiatric hospital because of an insinuation of a
mental disorder. It might be noticed, that such kind of procedures
has in Germany a very long tradition since the period of the
injustice
system in order to bring unpopular fellow humans to silence. I
don't think we should classify a country as member of a community
with democratic values and following rule of law, which do not
refrain to miss a muzzle to someone by blocking theirs
documentations. I'm quite sure that such occurrences
would be classified by dissidents and
human rights activists as
mechanism of states
of lawlessness but
not as mechanisms from constitutional
states.
Once
again we have to consider our history where the finding from
scientific historical research clearly
stating
that the worst humanitarian
catastrophe
was mainly caused by the unreflected behavior from members of
judicial and other official authorities.
|
|||||
The
worst humanitarian
catastrophewas
caused by unreflected behavior
from official authorities |
This kind of
behavior as submissive acting and complicity between companies and
authorities has been
|
||||
identified
by the scientific historical research as major cause of the
initiating and establishment of the worst injustice system within
human history. Therefore such kind of behaviors cannot be accepted
by individuals who intending to cover their perception of
responsibility due to our sinister
history.
Unfortunately,
we are still
confronted
constantly
to the issue that German judicial authorities haven't learned any
lessons from its burdened history. Until
today we still recognize within the German judicial system
behavior patterns
which has been identified as causes for the development toward the
injustice system by the
scientific
historical
research. I
am sure that this relates to the issue that judicial authorities
refuses until today the historical coming to terms about its
entanglement within the system of injustice.
All
historian describing the atmosphere of an injustice system that
individuals must beware what they are talking about in public.
These atmosphere of beware about the own speech is within Germany
until today a matter of the own self control which could cause
that individuals have to accept enormous punishments for a
statement such as "Should the suspicion be confirmed ...".
Such occurrences will be classified by all historians as
characterization of an injustice system.
|
|||||
The
author of this documentation saw in his live himself repeated
confronted with
matters where behaviors
|
We
should never again accept
unreflected behavior as it was the root cause of three injustice systems |
||||
from
judicial authorities can't be harmonized to requirements following
the rule of law. In all those cases the author had come to the
final evaluation that the German judicial system covers often only
a pretended
justice. From Greek philosopher Plato we
know that pretended justice is the worst form of injustice and the
author is even convinced that such kind of behaviors must be seen
as the absolutely root cause of the sinister German history.
Accepting such kind of behavior would be
tantamount with a possibly baleful repeating history. It has to be
considered that the unspeakable was not caused by suddenly
appeared monsters or by a generation with gene mutations. No, it
was caused by the unreflected behavior from normal neighbors,
colleagues, office peoples
and other fellow citizens. So,
it should be our duty to observe the usual living together in
order to identify issues which could cause again to a baleful
development. A behavior which relates a failed development only to
the reincarnation of monsters disregards the finding of the
scientific historical research. The
authors identical view with Plato about justice has caused that
the author will no longer accepting any pretended justice.
Therefore he decided once to document
all such occurrences which didn't follow the principles of the
rule of law. It could be an illusionary
way to a judicial system which follows indispensable the rule of
law but the heroes from our history have substantiated that it
might be not hopeless. Without a
perspective that it could happen to live in a judicial system
someday which indispensable follows the rule of law, would not be
worth living. I wouldn't want live in
such a country which bypasses dishonest with the past or with its
pretended justice.
I may ask
readers to contact the wrongdoers in order to point them to their
misbehavior, if agreeing with the authors point of view. Even it
should be considered that the campaign of the attorney of the
wrongdoers to abuse the author by the false and fraudulent
accusations of violating copyrights in his publications, is
without doubts similar to the facts which once has been identified
at the Nuremberg tribunal as crimes against humanity. Similar to
practices of the system of injustice where unwanted populations or
ethnic groups have been intimidated by slurs, defamation and smear
campaigns with the intention to cause them on renouncing their
rights, tried the attorney to damage the author credibility by
false allegations. It must be emphasized that, according to the
war crimes tribunal, the protagonist of such campaigns Julius
Streicher, pursued the aim to drive affected groups into suicide
or to expose them to the danger of liquidating by third parties.
As the author
is exposed to repressions which raises questions in his mind
whether he will survive this crisis, he is unsure whether he will
be able to finish the intended documentations. Nevertheless he has
the hope that others will assume their responsibilities in order
to have a look behind the cases instead of looking away which
unfortunately seems to be the default behavior of the human
species.
|
|||||
Many
thanks for your attention.
|
|||||
|
|||||
--
Best regards / Cordialement / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Abe Treiner
| Abe Treiner | ABT[at]abtsoft[dot]de | fon +49(0)8933040210 |
| Leopold St 124 | ABT[at]treiner[dot]net | fax +49(0)32221419153 |
| D-80802 Munich | Abe[at]treiner[dot]net | mob +49(0)1701076165 |
